Do you think a photograph can have a “sound” or a sense of silence?
Our take
This is more of a philosophical question about photography and atmosphere.
When you take or look at a strong photograph, do you ever feel like the image has a kind of “sound” to it? Not literal sound, but more like a feeling of silence, wind, distant noise, heavy air, space, or tension.
For example, some photos feel very quiet and heavy, some feel windy, some feel like you can almost hear distant city noise, and some feel completely silent.
I’ve been thinking about how much atmosphere in photography might be connected to what we imagine hearing when we look at an image, not just what we see.
Do you ever think about this when shooting? Do you try to capture this kind of atmosphere or mood, or is photography purely visual for you?
I would be really curious to hear how photographers think about this.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- [Instinct vs Intention in Photography. Where Does Real Art Happen?]I’ve been thinking about something and would love to hear your perspective: Do we create more meaningful or “true” photographic art in those moments when we stop thinking about rules, competitions, and exhibitions, when we just shoot instinctively? Or does stronger work actually come from being deliberate, carefully considering composition, light, timing, and all the small details? On one hand, spontaneity feels honest. When you’re not overthinking, you react to the moment, and sometimes that raw connection translates into something powerful. On the other hand, photography is also a craft. Understanding framing, balance, and technical choices can elevate an image and turn an ordinary moment into something intentional and refined. So where do you personally find your best work happens in instinct or in control? Or is it somewhere in between? submitted by /u/No_Surround_9694 [link] [comments]
- How does it FEEL to understand composition/story telling?Hello! I have a been photographing for roughly 6 months now and I would say my most obvious area of improvement is in composition and storytelling. Whats annoying to me is that some weeks I feel like I kinda understand it and some weeks i feel completly lost, like it just dosen’t click for me. In a weird way I can almost get stressed about that I don’t find the compositions that I am convinced are everyehere around me. Its like i have this preconception that if I was a great photographer I would be able to create something interesting out of anything/situation. This may be a harsh take but I also truly belive this about anything art related, from the right perspective (not physical perspective necessarily) anything can be interesting. For those of you that feel like this part of photography has clicked for you, I have a weird question maybe, but how this FEELS for you. Also if you have a ”method” for finding those captivating moments. Did you eventually learn to visualize the story/composition before hand and work towards/chase that specific photo? Or did you get good (and quick enough) that you are ”just there” and realize the story/stories as they unfold in the world around you? Do you remember when it finally clicked? As I am writing this I also realize that my way of thinking about this might be flawed. I dont mean that once it clicks there is nothing more to learn, but more like a baseline level of confidence regarding composition. I shoot mostly nature related stuff but I am interested in photography in general. submitted by /u/EstablishmentFew9149 [link] [comments]
- What can we still learn from Josef Koudelka today?I’ve been thinking a lot about Josef Koudelka’s work lately. What strikes me is how little he seems interested in “beautiful” images in the conventional sense. His photography feels raw, distant, often uncomfortable — but incredibly honest. From the Prague invasion to his long years in exile, everything in his work feels driven by necessity rather than aesthetics. I made a short video essay about this, trying to understand what we can actually learn from his approach today. But I’m more interested in your perspective: Do you think this kind of photography is still possible today? Or has social media changed the way we look — and shoot — too much? submitted by /u/Legal-Breakfast469 [link] [comments]