•1 min read•from Photography
Do you think more "natural" editing will be in demand due to the influx of AI?
Our take
In a world increasingly influenced by AI, the demand for more "natural" editing in photography may rise, as many seek authenticity in their images. Observing professional photos that mimic AI aesthetics can be concerning, especially when it comes to capturing genuine moments, like family portraits. While stylized images are often celebrated, they can leave clients longing for a more relatable and personal touch.
Recently saw some professional photos someone had posted and I know they didn't use AI to process the faces, but the faces gave the same kind of vibes as AI. I also see similarities when the photo has the saturation dialed up or things just look too smooth.
I had the thought that if I was paying for someone to take photos of my family, I would not be happy with them looking like that, even though I know that it's a stylistic thing and the photos would be considered good in most groups.
Has anyone experienced clients asking for less processing or seen people taking more of their own photos and relying less on professional photography services due to AI?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Event photography vs AI: do you feel insulated?I'm a software dev getting more serious about event photography on the side. I even have a hopefully regular paying client. Generative AI can obviously fake a convincing photo, but for events the value is capturing real moments. That feels harder to displace than, say, stock or product photography. Do working event/wedding/theatre photographers feel the same? Has the rise of GenAI actually changed anything for you? Are clients asking about it, or is this a non-topic? Feel free to add your thoughts if you come from another area of photography! submitted by /u/flowmyna [link] [comments]
- Computational photography pressure - When phone photos look “better”How do you deal with client expectations shaped by computational photography? I recently photographed an event where the lighting was challenging. There was a wide dynamic range, mixed and uneven light, and not many moments where the scene looked effortlessly polished. I brought along both my Nikon Z9 and Zf, but most of the shots ended up being taken with the Z9. I was still able to deliver a set of technically solid, well-lit photos. I edited them with selective masking and local adjustments, but I kept the overall look fairly realistic and true to the actual conditions. When I shared the gallery, I got the impression that the organizer was hoping for something a bit more “spectacular.” I noticed that some attendees had taken smartphone photos, and it seemed like she reacted more positively to those. The phone images had that appealing look: faces were evenly lit, with controlled, punchy contrast, giving off a sort of instant ‘cinematic’ feel, and the lighting appeared flawless I found that surprisingly difficult to deal with. Maybe part of it is my own skill level, and I’m open to that. But I also feel that computational photography has changed what non-photographers expect from images, especially in difficult lighting. Phones often produce an immediately pleasing version of reality, while professional cameras give us a more honest file that still requires judgement and restraint. For those of you shooting events professionally: do you feel pressure to match the “perfect” computational look of smartphone photos? How do you handle clients who seem to prefer that kind of processing? submitted by /u/meisjemeisje_1421 [link] [comments]
- Using AI to manipulate and NOT generate an image?I have a photo where the subject stays the same and I changed the background and added a reflection using AI assisted tools. Is this seen as okay since it’s not generating the image? Where is the line drawn? I know that a lot of people discuss the use of AI to denoise/remove objects/etc, and I wondered where this falls in that argument. submitted by /u/No_Understanding5271 [link] [comments]
- Photographers Raise Concerns as AI Use Surges Among ClientsAre photographers competing against AI? It's a question posed by a recent Vogue article after photographer Jack Davison questioned his Instagram followers on whether it is increasingly becoming an issue. [Read More]
Tagged with
#health and wellness#luxury photography#fashion photography#wellness photography#natural editing#AI processing#professional photography#client preferences#photo saturation#over-processing#stylistic photography#family photos#smooth textures#authenticity in photography#do-it-yourself photography#client dissatisfaction#AI influence#photography services#editing trends#photo quality