How do you feel about your photography?
Our take
The journey of a photographer often intertwines technical skill with artistic vision, creating a tapestry of experiences that shapes how one perceives the world through the lens. In a recent discussion, a user reflected on their personal evolution in photography, expressing a struggle between appreciating artistic expression and their own self-identification as a "technical person." This tension is not uncommon among those who embark on creative pursuits, and it raises important questions about the nature of artistry and the varied motivations behind capturing images. For those who wish to explore the technical side of photography, resources such as Think Tank PressPass 20 Review: No One Knew it Was a Camera Bag can provide invaluable insights into the equipment that supports this art form, while articles like PSA Good free panorama software exists, it was discontinued by Microsoft years ago but you can still find it highlight tools that can enhance technical proficiency.
The user’s journey from a casual "point and shoot" approach to a more intentional practice illustrates a pivotal moment many photographers experience. As they began to engage with landscape photography through online resources, they realized that photography could be an intentional art form rather than merely a technical task. This transition signifies a broader cultural shift where aspiring photographers are increasingly empowered by digital platforms to learn and develop their unique perspectives. The notion that one must possess an innate artistic drive to create compelling images can be demystified through such experiences, suggesting that creativity can be cultivated rather than solely inherent.
This exploration of identity in photography is essential for understanding the diverse motivations behind the craft. The user’s admission of feeling disconnected from the emotional aspects of photography—where other photographers discuss "feelings and vision"—echoes a common sentiment among many beginners. It underscores the reality that not every photographer will resonate with the emotional narratives often associated with art. Instead, this individual’s focus on capturing aesthetically pleasing images is equally valid, hinting at a more inclusive definition of what it means to be an artist. This opens the door to discussions about the role of technical skills in photography and how they can coexist with—or even support—the development of a personal artistic voice.
As the photography community continues to evolve, it is crucial to recognize and celebrate these varying pathways into the art form. The dialogue surrounding creativity, the technical versus the artistic, and the emotional connections to photography invites deeper reflection on what constitutes an artist. The experience of the user prompts us to consider whether the ability to create beautiful images can exist independently of a profound emotional connection to the work. Is it possible for someone to produce impactful photography purely from a technical standpoint?
Looking ahead, we may witness a shift in how we define artistry in photography. The blending of technical skills with personal expression has the potential to enrich the creative landscape, encouraging more individuals to engage with the medium. As we embrace this diversity, it becomes essential to create spaces that foster exploration without the pressure of conforming to traditional artistic standards. The next question for photographers—both seasoned and newcomers alike—could be: How can we further support each other in breaking down the barriers between technical proficiency and artistic expression, allowing more voices to contribute to the vibrant tapestry of photography?
I enjoy doing photography, but I don't feel like an artistic person the slighest bit
I always liked looking at nice photographs, appreciated when a photographer showed something in an unusual way, things like that. When taking photos myself, I was just a point and shoot kinda guy, not paying any attention whatsoever to subject, composition, light, etc.
This changed about 2 years ago, when I started to follow a few landscape photographers on youtube, and started to try to take photographs (landscape) more intentionally, trying to use what I learned from watching the videos. I never did anything artistic or even creative before in my life really, I have always been a technical person.
When I hear photographers talk about their photographs, they often mention feelings and vision, and stuff like this, which is very strange for my technical mind. I never have any vision, or feel anything (well, apart from enjoying myself) when I'm taking photos, I feel like my main motivation is that I just want to take nice pictures that look pretty. Boy, that sounds dumb. :D I can't even give a creative title to my photos, I see a lot of folks do that very well, but I can never come up with anything apart from literally descripting the image, so I never do that.
Does anyone else feel like this? Is it perhaps just a natural thing for a beginner in photography, or do you think some people are like this by nature, while other people are more artistic, in the sense that they feel the need to create, they have a drive to express themselves through their art? Do you think you can create good photos without being the latter type?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- How does it FEEL to understand composition/story telling?Hello! I have a been photographing for roughly 6 months now and I would say my most obvious area of improvement is in composition and storytelling. Whats annoying to me is that some weeks I feel like I kinda understand it and some weeks i feel completly lost, like it just dosen’t click for me. In a weird way I can almost get stressed about that I don’t find the compositions that I am convinced are everyehere around me. Its like i have this preconception that if I was a great photographer I would be able to create something interesting out of anything/situation. This may be a harsh take but I also truly belive this about anything art related, from the right perspective (not physical perspective necessarily) anything can be interesting. For those of you that feel like this part of photography has clicked for you, I have a weird question maybe, but how this FEELS for you. Also if you have a ”method” for finding those captivating moments. Did you eventually learn to visualize the story/composition before hand and work towards/chase that specific photo? Or did you get good (and quick enough) that you are ”just there” and realize the story/stories as they unfold in the world around you? Do you remember when it finally clicked? As I am writing this I also realize that my way of thinking about this might be flawed. I dont mean that once it clicks there is nothing more to learn, but more like a baseline level of confidence regarding composition. I shoot mostly nature related stuff but I am interested in photography in general. submitted by /u/EstablishmentFew9149 [link] [comments]
- How do you balance confidence and ego as a beginner photographer?I’ve been shooting photography for about 2 years now, mostly cars, but I tend to focus a lot on the people and atmosphere around them too. I don’t shoot super often, usually just a handful of times a month, but I do care a lot about improving and getting better over time. Lately I’ve been thinking more about how this could tie into my future, especially since I’m in marketing and interested in the creative side of things. Because of that, I’ve been paying more attention to how I approach my work and how I think about my own skill level. The thing I keep getting stuck on is the balance between being confident in my work and not having an ego about it. I’m self-taught, and while I like a lot of the photos I take and think some of them are genuinely good, I don’t really know what “good” is in an objective sense. I’m not always sure how my work actually stacks up or how other photographers would view it, and that’s where I start to question myself. I see people talk all the time about beginner photographers overrating their work, and I really don’t want to be that person or come across that way. At the same time, if I just assume my work isn’t that good, it kind of kills my motivation and makes the whole thing less enjoyable. So I’m trying to figure out how people deal with that. How do you stay confident enough to keep pushing forward while still being honest about where you’re at and what needs work? submitted by /u/LitUpSketcherss [link] [comments]