I think I'm just a bad photographer when it comes down to it.
Our take
I've been in photography since I was in High School, which dating myself, was about 25 yrs ago. I first went to film school, then I went to photography school. This was a major secondary interest for me after novel writing for just about the vast majority of my life. I've read probably 100 photography books, watched 1000s of videos on the craft. What I'm saying is, I should just be an absolute pro by now.
And don't get me wrong, I have taken some impressive photos from time to time. I like two things, landscapes, and studio work that draws upon my film school background, so think more in the ballpark of like Gregory Crewdson. Hell, I've sunk in total probably $20k over the years on various shoots, hiring models, makeup artists, hair stylists, getting wardrobes and set dressing. And out of like 8 shoots, maybe 2 of them were any good.
And yet, the real problem is, I feel like anytime I have had good results, it's almost been down to luck. And yet, I can hire a wedding photographer and while yes, they are curating, they're still giving great work. I'd fumble with settings, not know the right ones, every other photo under those lighting conditions would be hit or miss.
I have friends or family who have asked me for photoshoots because they see the work hanging on my walls or uploaded digitally and think, let's hire aniform! But every single time, I deliver terrible results. I've got all the lights that many here would envy and yet I am useless with them. I could make a softbox shot look ugly. I'm mostly just "in the dark" all the time, fumbling around my gear like a fool.
I needed some product photos and I thought, well of course, I'm a photographer, I'll do my own product photos! It took me ages to get everything dialed in, it looked terrible. So, I hired a product photographer and they were just in command. Put a light here, arrange it like this, and voila! A commercial-ready image.
I suppose my point is, I've got all the gear, got years of schooling, and the truth is, none of it matters. I just don't think I have the skills for this craft. And I'd bet if you asked to see some examples, you'd come back with, these are great, you're too hard on yourself. But what I see behind the scenes is the inconsistency. On one shoot I luck out, get fantastic shots, but on the very next one even following the same formula, it's trash. If you as a portrait photographer went to one client and then to the next with the work being either great or sloppy, depending on the day, you'd be out of work.
I think I'm just getting to a point, 30+ yrs into this that I wasn't meant to do it, even as a hobby and should have just put my money into something else entirely. I suppose I'm just making this post as a sort of confession, haha. But, I do wonder if maybe there are others who feel similarly like imposters.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Have not improved in photographing protests and Im losing hope.Hi all, This is kinda a rant/call for help/looking for advice post. Forgive me if it leans towards rantish though, im feeling pretty emotionally right now. I just came back from a protest today and I was culling through my photos. I took over 800 photos and only two of them were to my liking. I would say 15% were blurry, 60% had horrible compostion, and 20% had exposure issues (the day kept on going from extremely sunny to shady, so I dont hold too much grief over that). 5% are okay. Not great, nothing im proud of. I expected atleast 50% of my photos today to look like the 5%. But I keep on missing composition, subject isolating, and simply framing my scene. I keep thinking I know what im doing when Im shooting photos, and I kept looking back on my photos every 15-30 photos I took, and I kept thinking that these looked good. But im now looking at them and they are horrible. I didnt even "praticipate" in the protest this time, I simply focused my mind solely on taking photos and I still messed up. I tried shooting from below, above (to the best of my ability, limited elevated options), different focal lengths (18-55), and from different distances. I just never seem to improve no matter how many notes I take on my photography, how many times I mess up, and how many times I retry and go out again. It especially hurts because I hope to be able to become a conflict photographer in the future and seeing myself not able to do something like this makes me doubt myself if Ill ever be able to something of that nature. And its not as if Im extremely new to photography, Ive been shooting for over three years now, and althought that is nothing compared to everyone else, its not like im unexperienced. I just dont know what to do at this point, or how to feel, or what to tell myself. I want to be a better photographer, and I want to be able to communicate messages with my photos, but everything I produce is boring and flat and uninteresting. I love photographer so much but stuff like this just breaks me. That last part seemed rantish. sorry. Im just looking for advice. Anything works, and please dont be a smartass or douche, thank you. submitted by /u/Striking-Goal-591 [link] [comments]
- How do you balance confidence and ego as a beginner photographer?I’ve been shooting photography for about 2 years now, mostly cars, but I tend to focus a lot on the people and atmosphere around them too. I don’t shoot super often, usually just a handful of times a month, but I do care a lot about improving and getting better over time. Lately I’ve been thinking more about how this could tie into my future, especially since I’m in marketing and interested in the creative side of things. Because of that, I’ve been paying more attention to how I approach my work and how I think about my own skill level. The thing I keep getting stuck on is the balance between being confident in my work and not having an ego about it. I’m self-taught, and while I like a lot of the photos I take and think some of them are genuinely good, I don’t really know what “good” is in an objective sense. I’m not always sure how my work actually stacks up or how other photographers would view it, and that’s where I start to question myself. I see people talk all the time about beginner photographers overrating their work, and I really don’t want to be that person or come across that way. At the same time, if I just assume my work isn’t that good, it kind of kills my motivation and makes the whole thing less enjoyable. So I’m trying to figure out how people deal with that. How do you stay confident enough to keep pushing forward while still being honest about where you’re at and what needs work? submitted by /u/LitUpSketcherss [link] [comments]
- How do I transition out of photography?I feel like there are endless posts from people wanting to know how to get started or how to grow their business. I'm on the opposite side of the photography spectrum. I'm done. I don't enjoy it anymore and I can't stand my clients. I do realize how fortunate I am to make enough to only work 3 months out of the year, and have clients around the world. However the shallowness of society and the abundance of people booking me for the sake of social media has me at my breaking point. I refuse to use my skills for mindless content and am ready to hang up my camera after 15 years. This biggest question is, wth do I do now? I started out doing high profile event photography, photographing everyone from Jay Z to Versace, royal events, UN conferences, etc. That shifted to destination photography, documenting elaborate engagements around the world and vacations and honeymoons in the world's most exotic places. While for some that seems like a dream, it is beyond shallow. These people simply use the photos to show off and I feel like I can do something better with my time. However photography is all I know. I'm 39, got my first camera at the age of 10, started as a freelance photographer at Versace at 23 and built my own business at 25. I don't exactly have the credentials to do anything else but I sincerely hate my job and want to do something else. Any advice? submitted by /u/flt_p2ny [link] [comments]
- Photographer took unflattering photosJust wondering if anyone else has experienced this. I recently hired a photographer (I’m a photographer myself and I photograph weddings and content shoots). I love this photographers style and how they edit and the photos. The photos themselves objectively are not bad however I do genuinely feel like a portrait photographers job is to capture their subjects looking their best, work out their best angles and to take loads of photos in order to have plenty to choose from and options to replace photos their client isn’t happy with. I felt like my shoot was an after thought, when I first spoke with this photographer I showed him a load of inspiration in terms of angles and poses as I trusted the editing style but I wanted him to capture the energy I was after. He arrived with no shot list and it felt like he kind of winged it, we were on location bouncing around all day and he was asking me questions throughout the whole process and capturing really ugly shots of me talking (I assume in an effort to make me more relaxed? But it makes the shots look terrible) I love a candid but I think a mid conversation candid is a no no for a shoot tbh. He sent me the raws to choose from and there wasn’t that much to choose from so I settled for what I could hoping the edit might make me feel better about them. But to be honest with you, I feel like they’re don’t capture me looking my best at all and even the edit feels rushed and not carefully done and I feel like he just hasn’t done a good job. Does anyone else agree that as a portrait photographer he should at-least direct me a bit and help me find my best angles? That’s what I do almost every shoot I do, and the fact he didn’t arrive with any kind of shot list I just feel like he ignored my brief totally. Is it fair for me to ask for a reshoot in this situation? submitted by /u/Optimal-Rock-988 [link] [comments]