Low lighting sports advice
Our take
In the world of photography, transitioning from passion to profession can be both exhilarating and daunting. A recent discussion around low-light sports photography, particularly in the context of a rodeo event, underscores the challenges that many photographers face as they navigate this delicate balance. The insights shared by a photographer newly engaged in this arena highlight not only technical hurdles but also the broader significance of adaptability in a field that is constantly evolving. As many enthusiasts turn professional, they grapple with equipment limitations, lighting conditions, and the quest for optimal image quality — issues that resonate deeply with our readers, especially those who have explored topics like the impact of social media on creative careers in articles such as Why Getting More Likes Is Killing Your Photography Career.
The photographer’s experience with inadequate LED lighting at the rodeo serves as a poignant reminder of the unpredictability inherent in shooting live events. Unlike the controlled environments of studios or auditoriums, outdoor arenas present unique challenges, particularly when it comes to low-light conditions. The question raised about whether switching to RAW files could enhance post-processing capabilities is particularly relevant. While moving to RAW can indeed provide greater flexibility in editing, it also requires a nuanced understanding of the workflow, especially when time is limited during events that span hours with no breaks. For many photographers, the choice between JPEG and RAW isn’t merely a technical decision; it's a matter of efficiency and the ability to deliver quality work promptly.
Moreover, the conversation about equipment limitations and the necessity of upgrading gear is one that resonates with many in the creative community. It echoes sentiments expressed in our article on photography education, Photography students, what books where on your mandatory reading list in college?, where aspiring photographers are often encouraged to utilize the tools they have at their disposal while continuously seeking knowledge and adaptation. The challenges faced by the photographer in the rodeo scenario serve as a microcosm of the broader struggles within the profession, particularly for those who are just starting to establish themselves in competitive and demanding settings.
Ultimately, this discussion opens up a larger dialogue about the nature of photography as both an art and a profession. The balance between capturing the raw beauty of an event and navigating the technical limitations of equipment is a dance that every photographer must learn. As the community continues to evolve, it is essential to embrace innovation and flexibility, whether through mastering post-processing techniques or finding creative solutions to lighting challenges.
As we look to the future, one question looms: how will emerging technologies and innovative techniques reshape the way photographers approach low-light situations? With advancements in camera technology and editing software, the potential for creative breakthroughs is vast. However, the heart of photography remains in the artist's vision—and that is something that no amount of technology can replace. Our community stands on the brink of transformation, and the stories we share will undoubtedly illuminate the path forward for many aspiring photographers.
Hey y'all. So Ive recently become professional/paid after over a decade of just laying dormant so that I could build my life on other more steady income
Anyway, I have got myself a monthly gig that involves rodeo events in an outdoor horse arena. Last night I found out for the first time how bad the led stadium lights truly were. I've shot sports previously with stadium lights and in auditoriums but this was the worst I've ever seen. This is a very casual arena setup
I'm looking for advice on what I can reasonably change to be able to take profitable photos.
I use a D3. I was previously pushing it at Hi 2.0, 1/500, f/2.8 & jpeg fine. yes, I normally shoot sports at f/ 2.8.
Obviously at this point I was really really pushing it on quality. I dropped as low as I was willing to go on shutter speed. I normally shoot jpeg fine during these events for space saving. It's generally close to 5hour long event with no stopping, just heats back to back. This is a rodeo, with horses and myself in the arena. Flash is not an option
My first question, I dual slot 2 32gb cf cards currently. Would moving to raw files once the sun goes down help with the low light and grain in terms of post processing?
Or what post processing advice do y'all have?
Ultimately, if there isn't really a good tip y'all can give without me having to upgrade my body (which I can't afford to do currently), it's not the end of the world for me and I'd like to be told if there is no other option within the parameters of my D3. I get paid by the photo and it's extra income.
Thanks y'all
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- How can you make the best out of a bad lighting situation?I'm a new photographer and I just got home from an event I was taking pictures at feeling very discouraged and honestly a bit peeved at myself for the photos that I got. This event was in someones living room at night and the lighting was very very dim. I get discouraged from using flash in those kinds of intimate settings because it can be really annoying (or maybe I'm projecting and people actually don't actually care) Anywho, I got into this event for free because I offered to take photos but they all turned out terrible. Waaayyy too much grain, super blurry?? and like I said very very dim. I don't even know if any of them are salvageable at this point. I was trying to prioritize getting a light photo and I guess because the aperture was too low and the iso was too high and the shutter speed was too low it all became a mess but I have no idea. Here's an example of what my camera settings were at the time. Also I'm working with a Cannon ESO R10 with an 18-45. F/6.3 1/30 ISO 12800 Please please let me know what I could have done better to take a better picture! submitted by /u/Top_Today3786 [link] [comments]
- First time paid Event Photography in a ballroom. I have questions. Any good tips? Hi, I've been shooting semi-professionally for a few years for work events and whatnot. It's usually smaller scale. I'm actually getting paid decently and want to ensure that I'm taking my best steps so I can hopefully procure future work. I will be shooting in a ballroom which I will post pictures of. Looking at other photos the ceiling is white. I want to know if I should try to bounce my flash or use a white bounce card in case the ceiling is too tall? I was instructed to take photos of event speakers, how many shots do you think I should take? There are 5 speakers over 1 hour, obviously I won't be shooting the whole time. In your experience do people want photos of guests listening or eating for a corporate event? Then a reception to follow. I will probably have to do posed portraits and that's what I'm concerned if you think I would need much flash? It seems pretty well lit. I also have a Sony A7IV and a Tamron 35-150. Do you think that is enough length to get the speakers in enough detail? This was spur of the moment, a good friend asked me to do her a favor and I agreed. I would love to have shadowed a photographer first but I already agreed! Thanks in advance! submitted by /u/dubschloss [link] [comments]
- Do I need better gear for shooting sports?Hey everyone, I’m a pretty beginner photographer (\~1 year) who shoots mostly sports for fun. Currently I am shooting with a Nikon d5100 and a Nikkor 55-300 lens. The body and lens I believe came in a kit that I purchased off someone used for very little when I was starting off. I’ve noticed some issues with my pictures and I’m wondering if I need improvement or if I should consider new gear. Some issues: I can never seem to get the subject separated from the background which I suspect might be due to my lowest aperture being f/4.8. Second and most importantly, I can never seem to get a picture that is perfectly “clear and crisp” she zoomed in past like 120mm. Another issue, even at 1/4000 I feel that I miss action as the body can only shoot at 4fps. Overall I have been working on the things I can control like positioning, framing, being in the right place at the right time and all the aspects of shooting sports. That being said, I still feel my photos aren’t as clean as some I see. Should I consider new gear? I should note that I do this for fun and don’t plan on doing it for money, instead I mostly shoot Sunday league football (soccer) for friends or youth sports for my son. submitted by /u/CatBurglar_12 [link] [comments]