Non-editing photography
Our take
The conversation surrounding non-editing photography strikes a chord with many in the creative community, especially those who feel overwhelmed by the post-processing demands of digital photography. The query posed by a fellow photographer highlights a sentiment that resonates deeply: the struggle between the joy of capturing moments and the often tedious task of editing them. As shared in the article, the photographer finds greater satisfaction in honing their skills and immersing themselves in the art of taking pictures rather than salvaging shots that may not have turned out as envisioned. This perspective invites a broader dialogue about the essence of photography itself and challenges the prevailing notion that editing is an essential part of the craft. For those grappling with similar dilemmas, What's your processing process? offers insights into how others navigate this balancing act.
Editing has become synonymous with modern photography, yet the experience of many photographers—especially those who cherish the authenticity of their captures—suggests an alternative path. The idea of embracing the raw, unfiltered image can be liberating. Many photographers are rediscovering the beauty of imperfection, opting to forgo extensive editing in favor of a more genuine representation of their subject. This philosophy is echoed in discussions about whether one’s best photos emerge from meticulous editing or a more natural approach, as explored in Do you find that your best photos are the ones in which you do a lot or a little editing?. Here, we see an acknowledgment that sometimes, less is indeed more.
The emotional connection to photography plays a significant role in this discourse. The original poster's attachment to their Nikon D200, for example, suggests that sentimentality can color our experiences and choices in photography. The allure of the camera's CCD sensor and the unique qualities it imparts to images can inspire a more instinctual approach to capturing scenes. This sentiment echoes the thoughts shared in another related piece, Editing, where the notion of authenticity in photography is examined. The question arises: should we prioritize the technological capabilities of our equipment, or should we allow our creativity to flourish in the moment, unencumbered by the constraints of post-processing?
As we navigate this evolving landscape of photography, it becomes essential to consider not just the technical aspects but also the emotional and artistic implications of our choices. The rise of non-editing photography reflects a growing desire for authenticity in a world saturated with polished images. It challenges photographers to embrace their instincts and focus on the beauty found in the raw and unedited, fostering a deeper connection to their work.
Looking ahead, one must ponder how this trend will shape the future of photography. As we continue to explore the intersection of art and technology, will we see a resurgence in the appreciation of unedited images, or will the allure of post-processing reign supreme? This dialogue invites photographers of all levels to reflect on their practices and the stories they wish to tell through their lens.
Hi,
Are there any other people out there who are either too lazy or feel it’s too much hassle to edit or touch up your pictures or does this just come to you over time?
I am on and off photography and I played around with editing for a bit but severely dislike it, so right now my process is pretty much only using the jpegs (fine) and saving the raws for … god knows what.
I feel like I am happier spending the time actually taking pictures and improving this skill set instead of trying to salvage whatever mistreatment I put my sensor through this time.
How do you feel about editing in general and if you do the same do you have any tips?
I am using a Nikon D610 for “serious” stuff like concerts, astro and portraits and my beloved D200 for basically anything and everything I don’t know what makes me love the pictures so much, maybe sentiment or maybe the CCD magic is real 🤷🏼♀️
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- What's your processing process?You have a memory card full, what do you do next? Do you shoot raw? Do you batch edit? Do you delete or hold on to many? Do you keep only the stars? Once you've edited and developed, do you keep the RAWs/ originals? All of them, or just the killers? Do you make back ups? What do you do with your final photos? Do you ever revisit? Do you ever redevelop? Do you ever go back and delete others? submitted by /u/nozodia [link] [comments]
- Do you find that your best photos are the ones in which you do a lot or a little editing?I was going through favorite photos I've taken over the past year, and I realized that the majority of the "best pics" were ones that are almost raw. Now, I edit in the Mac photos app and at most crop and adjust the Light, Color, and maybe selective color if relevant. But even with that the photos that I (and others) think are best are almost entirely raw. It seems like getting the composition right straight out of the camera is the biggest commonality. There may be some adjustments to Light but that's about it. I guess a shot that looks good in the moment does generally translate to a strong photo. submitted by /u/Majestic-Watch-2025 [link] [comments]
- EditingTo me it seems that atleast in most situations editing photos kind of makes the photo unrepresentative of what it actually is trying to portray. I know in some situations of course editing photos is kind of part of what you are doing, but sometimes maybe in street photography it kind of confuses me when they show before and after, (or just the edited photo you can tell is edited) and it seems to just kind of ruin something that could have been more or more realistic. If you do edit your photos after, in what situations do you edit them, and why not just try to take photo that is good from the start? (In specific situations of course) Edit: when i say editing i am mostly referring to use of "filters"/presets submitted by /u/UNOsucks001 [link] [comments]
- What is your edit time per 100 photos (including culling)?I keep less than 1/4 of my photos but it takes me about an hour per 100 photos to cull and edit for myself (general settings are applied to all photos, color grading and exposure done manually for each photo). For work I am faster but being less sentimental helps, that way you don't go back and forth between the 10 identical photos of your child, deciding which one to keep. When I do weddings it takes a lot longer, because there I also do retouching. Reason behind my post is I am trying to find an estimation for how long it should take someone to sort and edit photos if I delegate it. submitted by /u/isak-combrinck [link] [comments]