Photographers: is it rude to ask upfront for RAW files instead of edited photos?
Our take
Is it rude to pre-negotiate receiving RAW images from a photoshoot instead of edited photos?
I shoot semi-regularly and have done portraits of friends and family, including editing in Lightroom. That said, I'm not a professional in the sense that I don't have a business, nor do I have any intention of starting one.
I'm graduating from grad school soon, and I looking for a photographer to take grad photos. Ideally, I'd like to find someone willing to do the shoot and provide the images unedited — essentially, I just want to pay for the RAW files.
I understand that most photographers prefer not to share RAW files for a variety of reasons: they're essentially the negatives, there are concerns about the images being poorly edited and still associated with the photographer's name, and so on. It also seems like a lot of the frustration comes from clients asking for RAWs after the fact.
With all of that in mind, my plan would be to bring this up during the initial outreach to the photographer, not after. Would you be upset or annoyed if a potential client proposed this arrangement upfront? And for those who would be open to it, how would skipping the editing phase affect your pricing? Any advice on how to frame the request respectfully?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Raw imagesHey guys, I’m an amateur photographer , just started out and I needed some shots to gain some experience and confidence as a photographer. So I asked a friend to do an outdoor shoot for free, another one of my friends volunteered as well so I took shots of both of them. They came out really well and I edited them because I want my brand to be more vintage. My friend that originally came mostly complained the entire time and wasn’t a very good sport. But the other was very willing to help and was by far an outstanding model. I was a little annoyed and at the end of the shoot he asked to upload all of the original photos to his laptop, and I declined. And sent over the edited photos. And he asked for the raw images again, and I declined. Was this wrong or rude? Need some advice submitted by /u/itsmecela [link] [comments]
- Additional imagesHi everyone, I am new to Reddit and hope this would be the right community to ask this question. I’m a portrait photographer and wanted to get some insight on how others handle this. I don’t offer RAWs as part of my workflow, and it’s in my contract. I also don’t send full galleries or proofs either. I hand edit all my images and deliver a curated set, but sometimes clients ask for more photos and want to see everything to consider purchasing additional images. When I let them know they can purchase additional photos at $15 each, they’ll ask how they’re supposed to choose if they can’t see what they’re purchasing first (logically I get it).** **I usually tell them I can take into account anything specific they’re looking for, but ultimately I’m the one selecting what’s added, and I try to make sure it still feels true to the session. But of course, not everyone is ok with that. Just trying to find the best way to handle that while still keeping my workflow and boundaries in place. Would love to hear what’s worked others submitted by /u/JayImages [link] [comments]
- Is it rude to ask photographers to trade product for a shoot?I run a small spirits brand and we’ve got some really nice bottles that photograph well. I’m not a photographer, but I know good product shots matter a lot for marketing. I’ve been thinking about reaching out to photographers to see if anyone would be interested in trading a few bottles for a shoot instead of paying cash, especially for people who want to build out product/portfolio work. I’m not talking about huge commercial campaigns, more like a few styled shots for social/media use. From a photographer’s perspective, is that considered rude or a waste of time? Or is it fair game if expectations are clear and the value feels reasonable? Curious how people here view that kind of arrangement. submitted by /u/rtice001 [link] [comments]
- Client wants me to share all my photos after I delivered what was stipulated.Hey everyone, I’m looking for some perspective from more experienced photographers on how to handle this situation. I recently shot a small civil wedding (about 2 hours of coverage which the were basically them signing papers in their house and eating/being gathered). Before the event, I clearly communicated in writing that the final delivery would be around 40 edited photos. During the shoot, I ended up taking around 500 photos total, which includes: bursts of the same moment test shots for exposure/framing duplicates shots where someone blinked, moved, etc. As expected, after culling and editing, I delivered a curated gallery of 60+ edited images (so actually more than what I initially mentioned). Now the client is questioning why they didn’t receive more photos, since they remember I mentioned I took around 500. They’re asking for access to all the photos, including the ones that weren’t selected. From my perspective: The final delivery is meant to be a curated selection of the best images The remaining photos are either duplicates, test shots, or not up to standard I don’t normally deliver unculled/unedited images as part of my workflow I did offer to: 👉 review any specific moments or people they feel are missing 👉 and include additional images if there are any worth delivering But I’m not comfortable sending the full unculled gallery. They look like garbage and it’s through editing that I make them look great (as they already said they were spectacular) My questions: How do you usually explain the difference between total shots vs final deliverables? Do any of you ever provide access to all images? If so, under what conditions? Would you stand firm here or handle it differently? Appreciate any insight — just trying to handle this professionally and also learn for future job submitted by /u/AjVine [link] [comments]