•1 min read•from Photography
Overshooting vs. being selective
Our take
In the world of photography, the debate between overshooting and being selective often shapes one's creative process. Overshooting allows for spontaneity, capturing fleeting moments that might otherwise be missed, while a selective approach encourages deliberate composition and thoughtful framing. Each method has its merits, influencing not only the outcome of the images but also the photographer's experience during the shoot.
When you’re out shooting, do you tend to take lots of photos and sort through them later, or do you try to be very selective and only press the shutter when you’re confident about the shot?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- [Instinct vs Intention in Photography. Where Does Real Art Happen?]I’ve been thinking about something and would love to hear your perspective: Do we create more meaningful or “true” photographic art in those moments when we stop thinking about rules, competitions, and exhibitions, when we just shoot instinctively? Or does stronger work actually come from being deliberate, carefully considering composition, light, timing, and all the small details? On one hand, spontaneity feels honest. When you’re not overthinking, you react to the moment, and sometimes that raw connection translates into something powerful. On the other hand, photography is also a craft. Understanding framing, balance, and technical choices can elevate an image and turn an ordinary moment into something intentional and refined. So where do you personally find your best work happens in instinct or in control? Or is it somewhere in between? submitted by /u/No_Surround_9694 [link] [comments]
- What's your processing process?You have a memory card full, what do you do next? Do you shoot raw? Do you batch edit? Do you delete or hold on to many? Do you keep only the stars? Once you've edited and developed, do you keep the RAWs/ originals? All of them, or just the killers? Do you make back ups? What do you do with your final photos? Do you ever revisit? Do you ever redevelop? Do you ever go back and delete others? submitted by /u/nozodia [link] [comments]
- Do you find that your best photos are the ones in which you do a lot or a little editing?I was going through favorite photos I've taken over the past year, and I realized that the majority of the "best pics" were ones that are almost raw. Now, I edit in the Mac photos app and at most crop and adjust the Light, Color, and maybe selective color if relevant. But even with that the photos that I (and others) think are best are almost entirely raw. It seems like getting the composition right straight out of the camera is the biggest commonality. There may be some adjustments to Light but that's about it. I guess a shot that looks good in the moment does generally translate to a strong photo. submitted by /u/Majestic-Watch-2025 [link] [comments]
- Non-editing photographyHi, Are there any other people out there who are either too lazy or feel it’s too much hassle to edit or touch up your pictures or does this just come to you over time? I am on and off photography and I played around with editing for a bit but severely dislike it, so right now my process is pretty much only using the jpegs (fine) and saving the raws for … god knows what. I feel like I am happier spending the time actually taking pictures and improving this skill set instead of trying to salvage whatever mistreatment I put my sensor through this time. How do you feel about editing in general and if you do the same do you have any tips? I am using a Nikon D610 for “serious” stuff like concerts, astro and portraits and my beloved D200 for basically anything and everything I don’t know what makes me love the pictures so much, maybe sentiment or maybe the CCD magic is real 🤷🏼♀️ Thanks for sharing your thoughts! submitted by /u/pipipopokaki [link] [comments]