How do I publish my work online without it being fed to ai
Our take
I have been taking pictures on my cameras for years like since 2017 and have explored and photographed lots of unseen and interesting spots on my traveling adventures, while I was in uni for photography.
I have never posted anything online on a website and never considered my work to be good enough but yesterday while going through my pictures after a long time I realized It’s no where near bad and should be posted out there so other’s get to experience what I experienced too… only issue is people just feed everything to ai these these to
Train it and at my old creative work place they never did any shooots they just took pictures from google and fed it to to make some changes..
Imagine being an artist taking 8,9 hours plus hikes to take pictures of nature and you see it on a calendar or smthn because a company wanted to avoid copy rights or designing a whole set and directing a shoot and then seeing it on Pinterest because a furniture company decided to feed it ai to place their furniture in it
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- AI AdventHey guys, Hope everyone is well, wo I am a product and food photographer in a third world country. I am an expert, one of the very few in the country and I am fortunate enough to work with the big brands here. Since it's a third world country even the big brands here and their agencies are trying to cut as much production cost as possible and I've seen them starting the switch to AI, mainly Nano banana. I love this work that I do but it seems to me that it would be a good idea to start considering other income sources before the switch completely happens, if it does. I love to travel and wanna somehow tie it up with my passion for photography but the passport of a third world country gets in the way. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks. submitted by /u/OkFaithlessness6374 [link] [comments]
- Anyone else in a crisis with photography?Since a while, with image optimization and AI tools so widely spread, I notice that I don't take photos serious anymore. Whenever I see a 'strong' image somewhere, I'd glance at it and think "Well, artificial anyway" and wouldn't occupy myself with it as I used to. I just can't take any photographic picture serious anymore. Somehow, photography is not functioning anymore for me. It has become arbitrary. Is it because of the sheer amount? Because of digital, or AI? Anyone else experiences the same? What is your mileage? submitted by /u/thinkingthetwenties [link] [comments]
- Why are we so obsessed with AI?Like title says... There was always a lot of bad images, remember HDR style a 10 or 20 years ago? Lately there is a lot of trashy pictures edited for chinese apps like Tikitok, Instagram, and so on. There will always be bad taste editing and we still can make our pictures look like we like it to look. What is the problem, that AI will generate some shit? And where is the limit? Isn`t it AI making autofocus so reliable and white balance better? We all benefit new technology and AI will not create our memories we captured on camera. It will just make some paintings, what is the problem? submitted by /u/Kuchciu [link] [comments]
- Photo authenticity in the age of AII’ve been thinking about how photographs are perceived by audiences in the age of AI. It’s become very easy to dismiss an image as AI-generated, like this one showing asperitas clouds, but confirming that a photo is genuine often requires prior knowledge or context that most viewers don’t have. Are there any established standards or best practices photographers can use to assure their audience that a digital photograph is authentic? As a software engineer, I tend to think of solutions such as public key cryptography. However, this is not something most people are familiar with. It could still allow a more technical audience to verify that a photograph, including its EXIF data and possibly a thumbnail render of the raw image from the camera, was signed by the photographer and has not been significantly altered (except color corrected) since capture. submitted by /u/v3gard [link] [comments]