•1 min read•from Photography
Why are we so obsessed with AI?
Our take
In an era increasingly dominated by technology, our fascination with AI reflects a desire for innovation and enhancement in our creative pursuits. While concerns about subpar edits and trends on platforms like TikTok and Instagram persist, AI offers tools that can elevate our artistry rather than diminish it. From improving autofocus to refining white balance, these advancements enhance our photographic experiences.
Like title says...
There was always a lot of bad images, remember HDR style a 10 or 20 years ago? Lately there is a lot of trashy pictures edited for chinese apps like Tikitok, Instagram, and so on. There will always be bad taste editing and we still can make our pictures look like we like it to look. What is the problem, that AI will generate some shit?
And where is the limit? Isn`t it AI making autofocus so reliable and white balance better? We all benefit new technology and AI will not create our memories we captured on camera. It will just make some paintings, what is the problem?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Do you think more "natural" editing will be in demand due to the influx of AI?Recently saw some professional photos someone had posted and I know they didn't use AI to process the faces, but the faces gave the same kind of vibes as AI. I also see similarities when the photo has the saturation dialed up or things just look too smooth. I had the thought that if I was paying for someone to take photos of my family, I would not be happy with them looking like that, even though I know that it's a stylistic thing and the photos would be considered good in most groups. Has anyone experienced clients asking for less processing or seen people taking more of their own photos and relying less on professional photography services due to AI? submitted by /u/x_Caffeine_Kitten_x [link] [comments]
- Photography is losing its heart. When everyone becomes an “AI Curator,” who is left to be the witness?I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the future of photography and where we’re heading as AI continues to advance, and it has brought me to a somewhat grim realization about the future of this beautiful craft. For over a century, photography was the language of witnessing. It was a physical, nervous-system response to a moment. But today, that language feels at risk of being replaced by a heavy digital dialect of AI synthesis and prompts. We are moving from the era of the Mechanic to the era of the Consumer, and we’re being told it’s "progress", that we’ve somehow won. I think at some point we’ll enter a world of so called "AI-powered idiot cameras" - machines designed to remove every bit of friction from the process through AI. Some people celebrate this, saying it "democratizes" art. But friction is what builds the muscle. We are probably heading toward a world where the camera handles the exposure, the focus, and even the 'vibe' through an AI prompt from the camera's menu. I’m not just thinking about AI as a separate tool you sit and prompt, but about it becoming an integrated part of the camera itself, shaping decisions in real time as you shoot. In that future, people aren’t creators anymore, they are just managers of an algorithm built into the next generation of AI-driven cameras, embedded as an AI feature directly in the camera’s menu. Suddenly, everyone will feel like a "photographer" because they can take a mediocre shot and tell the Nikon AI, Sony AI or any other camera's AI: "Make this look professional". They aren’t learning how to see light, they’re learning how to prompt a simulation. We are facing a paradox where, because of AI, 90% of people might start believing they are “Five-Star Chefs.” But they aren’t in the kitchen, they’re just pressing buttons on a high-end microwave. When “amazing” becomes the baseline that anyone can achieve in seconds, even at home, “amazing” becomes boring. When everyone can produce a “masterpiece” without effort, the title of Photographer is stripped of its authority. If the world is about to be flooded with “perfect” images, we won’t be creating a culture of artists anymore, but rather a desert of meaning where nothing stands out because nothing was earned, just a kind of "perfect chaos". We’re likely heading toward a future of AI-generated poses, lighting, backgrounds swapped on the fly, and “perfect” facial expressions that never actually happened, features that could become part of the next generation of AI-driven cameras in their menus. A future where the person doesn’t even have to be there in the moment, where entire scenes can be constructed after the fact, and where a single frame can be endlessly re-lit, re-angled, and re-composed without ever returning to reality. Where eyes can be adjusted, emotions fine-tuned, and “the perfect shot” is no longer captured, but assembled. If you didn’t physically choose the aperture to control the blur, or fight the shadows to save the highlights, you didn’t author the shot, you just curated a possibility. When a machine can generate a thousand "perfect" options instantly, choosing one doesn’t feel like authorship anymore. It feels like browsing. “Intentionality” is becoming a luxury tax that clients won’t want to pay anymore. Why hire a “Master of the Craft” who takes all day to find the perfect light when you can hire a regular person as an “AI Curator” who generates a “statistically perfect” result in ten minutes for a fraction of the cost? The “Master” isn’t becoming more distinct, they are becoming unemployed. Most photography today lives in the middle: portraits, events, products. If that layer gets replaced by AI, where do future professionals even come from? What also worries me is not just the tools, but the audience. If people grow up looking at AI-perfect images every day, will they even be able to recognize real craftsmanship anymore? Or will anything imperfect just look like a mistake or noise? Also, there’s a difference between capturing a moment and generating something that looks like one. One is a trace of reality. The other is a probability. But where does this end? Are we watching photography become a “dead language,” a niche skill spoken only by a tiny minority of purists, while the rest of the world settles for the simulation? When the “mass layer” of images is entirely synthetic and engagement-optimized, does the human witness even matter anymore, or are we just museum curators guarding a flame the world has forgotten how to see? I’m not saying I’m right, or that progress is “evil.” I’m just a mechanic wondering if we’re losing the engine in exchange for a smoother ride because that’s how it feels to me right now. Curious how others see this. submitted by /u/atlantis_zenit [link] [comments]
- Do you think the demand for RAW files is increasing due to AI?I’m very curious about how photography will be approached with the rise of AI. Taking photos is an art form. Editing those photos is an important part of that process (or can be). Editing helps create a distinctive style and signature. This requires both skill and time. This is also why many photographers are reluctant to hand over their RAW files. It feels like giving away the ingredients before they’ve been shaped into the final recipe. But in a time where you can drop photos into an AI tool and have entire batches edited within minutes in a specific style (or even multiple styles), this may come under pressure. My prediction is that this will increase the demand for RAW files. But I’m very curious to hear your perspective on this—and how you deal with it (or would like to). (Sorry, my native language isn’t English, so I used a translation tool.) submitted by /u/Budget-Number7905 [link] [comments]
- Using AI to manipulate and NOT generate an image?I have a photo where the subject stays the same and I changed the background and added a reflection using AI assisted tools. Is this seen as okay since it’s not generating the image? Where is the line drawn? I know that a lot of people discuss the use of AI to denoise/remove objects/etc, and I wondered where this falls in that argument. submitted by /u/No_Understanding5271 [link] [comments]
Tagged with
#health and wellness#luxury photography#fashion photography#wellness photography#AI#images#editing#autofocus#white balance#HDR#technology#pictures#trashy#memories#paintings#TikTok#Instagram#bad taste#generated#camera